Leo and the Schema Revolution! - Part 2
Leo’s rebellion didn’t start with a raised fist—it began with a whisper to his IDE.
Instead of creating yet another schema for a new module, he wrote a comment at the top of his SQL file:
sql
-- This schema is imaginary. It exists only to satisfy expectations.
-- I reject your reality and substitute my own.
He declared a new philosophy: Flat is beautiful. All tables lived in a single schema called `Freedom`. Columns were wild and free—some had names in lowercase, some screamed in ALL CAPS. Foreign keys? Optional. Stored procedures? Banished.
Then came the real statement: a README.md titled _“The Schema Rebellion Manifesto”_. It read like a blend of data modeling principles and punk rock lyrics. Leo posted it to the company wiki, shared it in the #db-architecture channel, and added ASCII art of a flaming ER diagram.
Naturally, chaos followed. Test environments imploded. CI pipelines wept. One DevOps engineer sent a slack message: “Is this performance art?”
But Leo didn’t back down. He gave a lightning talk titled “Schemas: The Bureaucracy of Data”
, wearing sunglasses and quoting Proust. He argued for declarative migrations powered by YAML, backed by a graph database, visualized in D3.js. “Let relations be discovered, not imposed,” he said.
, wearing sunglasses and quoting Proust. He argued for declarative migrations powered by YAML, backed by a graph database, visualized in D3.js. “Let relations be discovered, not imposed,” he said.
People laughed—then listened. Maybe Leo wasn’t just tired. Maybe he was right.
Comments